Issue No. 190 | April 24, 2025
I have a friend who barely pays attention to golf. We met last week to talk about writing and books and things we are both working on. “I watched the Masters,” he told me. “And … this is strange … it made me want to go play a game I have almost no interest in.”
There is a bit of magic, a bit of mystery to this game. I think it is probably the most mystical of all the sports, mostly because of how tethered it is to nature and how powerful the pull of nature can oftentimes be.
SMartin wrote about this recently.
To me, golf is an inexhaustible subject.
Bobby Jones
I also find the game and its branches to be almost limitless in their intrigue. They suck me in again and again. When you start a business like this, there is always a fear that you won’t have enough material or content to work with, but the truth is that you almost always have too much, to the point of being overwhelmed.
The best game. I love loving it.
And one of my favorite places I have experienced the game is Erin Hills. I was there for the 2017 U.S. Open, and it is such a wondrous property.
Fun to get around, easy to get lost. It is grand.
This year, the USGA returns with the U.S. Women’s Open presented by Ally on May 29-June 1. I could not be more excited about this. The U.S. Women’s Open is not only my favorite women’s golf event to tune into every year but also one of my favorite events overall.
This year, the USGA had the second most qualifier entries in the event’s 80-year history, including entries from a 9 year old (!) and a 61 year old (!).
Very normal sport stuff right there.
If you are even remotely in the area of Erin Hills, you should make your way out to the event for a day or two or the entire week.
There are few opportunities better than a women’s major to see greatness up close, to get the kids #involved and to send me all kinds of normal sport-related photos than a women’s major, and especially this women’s major.
You can get tickets right here.
The 15th at sunset. How can you not be romantic about golf?
1. Let’s just get right into it.
I was bouncing around the other day when I saw this clip of Eamon talking about how JT is the best American player of his generation. If you watch the entire thing, it’s actually more defensible than the headline would lead you to believe, but still … JT might not even be the best American player from his generation in his Tuesday money game.
What Eamon is saying is that JT is the best player from his class (Spieth, Berger etc.), which is decidedly not a generation. That begs the question, though, what is a generation? Are Brooks (age 34) and JT (31) in the same generation? What about JT and Rory (35)? JT and Scottie (28)?
We (I) throw the term “generational player” around with absolutely no regard for what it actually means. In my head, though, I think of a generation being 10 years. Generational player = someone who comes along once a decade. Rory is generational. Rahm might be generational. Phil and Tiger were (obviously) generational. I thought Spieth was, too.
So then I guess the JT question depends on when you start his generation. Does every player have his own generation of 10 years, spanning five years on either side of his age? Do you just look at decades (like 2000-2009 and 2010-2019)?
If your span is 10 years like mine is, then five years on either side of JT includes Brooks and Scottie. This seems like a … not unreasonable way to look at things? In Brooks’ case, it would put Rory in his generation but Scottie and Morikawa (28) would not be. I think that’s also fair? Kinda similar to how I don’t think DJ (40) and JT are in the same generation.
Anyway, JT is not the best American player of his generation. Brooks is. And Spieth may still be hanging on. And Bryson has a claim as well. And depending on how you define it, Scottie has probably passed all of them.
Here’s one head-to-head JT comp.
Spieth vs. JT
Whose career would you rather have? Who would trade their career for the other guy’s?
And this — Spieth vs. JT, which, I admit is heading in the wrong direction for Spieth — is the least compelling of the arguments for best American of his generation.
Here’s JT vs. Brooks by the way.
JT vs. Brooks
Aside: How strange has Brooks’ career been? Has anyone ever won 5+ majors and outpaced his PGA Tour total? Andy North (two majors, one PGA Tour win) is a decent comp, I guess, but Brooks is tied with Nelson and Seve!
Here’s the truth: It may end up that JT — who I absolutely ride for — goes down as the best American of his generation, but as it stands right now, I would argue that he’s not even in the top three within his generation. And even if we’re using Eamon’s definition of the same year, I’m not sure he’s even in the top two (Spieth and Bryson)!
2. A version of this gets passed around every year, and every year I get sucked in.
My answers this year …
9 tee to 7 green — par 5
6 tee to 15 green — par 3
14 tee to 12 green — par 4?
I stole that last one from Jamie Kennedy because it is brilliant.
My 6 tee to 15 green might be dumb considering how much that green tilts toward the water on 15. You might literally not be able to hold it. I’ll ride for 9 tee to 7 green though. You going to play it down 8 (which is shorter) or up 9 (which provides the better angle)?
You could maybe get me going on 16 tee to 6 green, too. And I like this suggestion from Jake Nichols.
All of this would obviously require clearing some (if not a lot of) trees, but that place is just the best golf playground.
3. How do we feel about Collin Morikawa right now? I thought he was going to win a lot this year and predicted that he would win Player of the Year. Though he still might win some, he almost certainly will not be POY, and his performance to date has made me question some things.
Like, this is a list I expect Corey Conners to be on.
Collin Morikawa is not Corey Conners.
Right?
This post will continue below for Normal Club members and includes …
Nick Faldo’s insane Masters record.
xWins at majors since 2020.
A podcast business I’m always compelled by.
If you aren’t yet a Normal Club member, you can sign up right here.
If you are, keep reading!
Normal Sport is supported by exactly 812 deranged individuals. By becoming a member, you will receive the following …
• Our very best stuff during the majors.
• First access to future merch drops.
• The delight of helping us establish this business.
By clicking below to join the Normal Club, you will also be eligible for our 2025 PGA Championship fantasy contest where we’ll have several a prize fund tantamount to the 1925 PGA. We’re just 100 years behind (not adjusted for inflation).
It's a treasure trove of the important, the seemingly important, and — importantly! — the unimportant stuff. It's an asset in my inbox.
Normal Sport is exploratory, ometimes emotional, always entertaining. It also has one of my favorite writers in the biz at its foundation.
Few make the sport feel as fun and as thought provoking.
Kyle is the best columnist in sports. That he has channeled those talents through strokes gained and Spieth memes is a blessing to golf.
Kyle approaches coverage of the game with both conviction and curiosity
The way Kyle has been able to mold a silly Twitter joke (normal sport) into a must-read newsletter on the weekly happenings in our silly game gives a great look into why he's one of the smartest people in golf.
Kyle's content is a product of a sick sense of humour, a clear passion for golf and unquestionable dedication to hard work. That's not normal!
Kyle sees golf in a way that no one else does—and we're all fortunate to get to share in that view through Normal Sport!
Kyle is one of the best in the golf world at finding and synthesizing the absurd, the thoughtful and the fun things that make being a golf fan worthwhile.
There’s been no one else in golf that has tickled my funny bone as often as Kyle Porter does. He’s been instrumental in ushering in a new era of golf coverage and it’s been a pleasure to be along for the ride in that.
I’ve always enjoyed your love for golf. So often I see favoritism showed to golfers in the social media world, but I enjoy reading you telling a situation how it is regardless of the person.
Kyle is a perfect curator of the necessary moments of levity that accent a sport that will drive most of us insane.