Asking for more money for seemingly no reason at all seems to be quite en vogue in professional golf right now!
But here is the actual reason we are asking readers to become members: Reader support is part of our path to building a sustainable business.
While I personally take advantage of the benefits of most of the places I subscribe to, the primary reason I subscribe to them is mostly because I want them to exist for a long time.
I am guessing many of you are the same.
We will provide plenty of value for all you Normal Sporters out there, yes -- obviously that is our job, and I hope we’ve earned your trust on that front -- but my main pitch is (and probably always will be): We all want this to exist, let’s make it exist.
We wanted to take the top off the defense and allow those of you who are (in some cases, literally, in others, figuratively) making FedEx Cup money to help build this place as we start to get off the ground.
That’s why we’re introducing a minimum membership price but no set number on what you want your membership to cost. The benefits are no different, though we may sneak in a few surprises for you if you exceed that $82 minimum.
I say this a lot, but I am constantly blown away that anyone would want to read my thoughts about golf and enjoy Jason’s illustrations. This is all we want to do professionally, and reader membership helps ensure that it is all we ever will do.
$82/yr is the minimum necessary to become a Normal Sporter.
This means ...
Why $82? To honor Tiger’s incredible run of 82 PGA Tour victories? Of course not.
No, it’s out of respect for Sam Snead’s co-record of 82 PGA Tour victories, which includes wins at the prestigious Anthracite Open, the Miami Biltmore International Four-Ball and the Palm Beach Round Robin which featured a total of 15 golfers who played 126 holes of match play in various groups of three to determine a winner.
Normal stuff.
But we digress!
That’s right. You can become an elevated member and pay whatever you want up to the very normal number of $502. We opened this option up because, as noted above, we wanted to give you the opportunity to support our endeavor.
I remember talking to a newsletter writer some of you may have read a few years ago, and he was dismayed that he had people that he knew that were billionaires (literal billionaires) on his email list, but he was charging them the same thing I was paying. We are trying to take that into consideration when building a business model.
And if you are in fact andyh2oman@protonmail.com (or a different billionaire who subscribes to a newsletter about geese and golf), and are interested in paying over $502 a year, please seek help contact me.
If you understand any of these jokes, it’s probably time to sign up!
As No. 5 states, you will immediately receive all of our annual Normal Sport books, which means the first $82 comes close to paying for itself as soon as you spend it.
Like my wife tells me when she goes to Hobby Lobby, “All of it was on sale, they basically paid us.” Same concept, just with jokes about Scandinavian golfers and not discounted lamps and fabric supplies.
This is a good question.
As we thought through potential business models with our team, we considered every possibility. We could ...
None of those options seemed palatable, and the more I studied other newsletter models, the more the one we landed on made the most sense.
This doesn’t mean NS will be ad-free.
We believe the advertising experience doesn’t have to be terrible, but we also believe that it always will be terrible if ads are your only source of revenue.
We have already partnered with some high-quality brands and integrated their products into our content, and we believe (and hopefully have proved) that it is something that can be done tastefully.
Howevah ... I have noticed a trend highlighted by this screenshot I took the other day.
That's an article. Or so I'm told.
So much of the internet is borderline unusable to the point that I’m not sure whether the purpose of the ads is to subsidize the content or whether it’s the other way around.
I am convinced of two things, though.
There is a clear race to the bottom with the future of men’s pro golf on the internet as businesses try and squeeze every last nickel from every last consumer.
It’s not one we will be participating in, though, and I’m hopeful this model will facilitate that aspiration.
The other day, I was sitting at the table with my dad (age: 69), and he said, “So ... how does all of this work?”
Translation: “How on earth are you going to support a family of six on a mostly free newsletter?!” I can tell it’s a question others have wanted to ask but haven’t known how to phrase.
If I’m honest about all of this, here’s the dream: 10,000 people become members (Normal Sporters), and I just write my face off for them and maybe we have 2-3 partnerships with awesome brands, that’s our entire business.
This does happen. It has happened.
So is it technically possible for a niche golf newsletter? Sure!
But is it plausible? Absolutely not!
So while I would love a model that is almost exclusively readers paying us for our work, I think the following three-legged model is going to work well for us in the future in terms of revenue.
Will all of that somehow meld together to create a business that survives? Who knows! But it’s our very best effort at a company, and we’re going to try and keep extending our runway from 4 months (where it started) to 8 and then from 8 months to a couple of years and then from a couple of years to the time when Sammy Spieth is winning all the Masters his father did not.
It’s important for you to know what in the world you’re even contributing to. If our value prop to you is “let’s make this thing exist,” you should know what this thing actually is.
Here are five points on that. You are …
1. Casting a vote for trusted, independent media. It hasn’t been a banner decade for mainstream media. And while I personally believe a lot of what is said about the MSM is outrageous or just untrue, what is true is that we – with our vision of becoming the most unique publisher of text and illustration in the golf world – can be more creative, nimble and forthright than many other outlets.
2. Moving us one step closer to having a full-time team. Right now, I am the only full-time employee. But we would love to bring others on – specifically our illustrator, Jason Page, who is currently a freelancer who is sketching everything short of Spieth yelling “go get that” on the sistine chapel ceiling. We would love to have the space to give him a full-time spot at Normal Sport.
3. Giving us space to realize other one-off projects. We’ve got too many ideas about making children’s books and other books like 20 Reasons We Love (And 2,000 Reasons We Hate) Jordan Spieth. We aspire to build even more content than the newsletter you are now reading. Your membership gives us back the time we spend generating ad sales and allows us to spend it on content creation.
4. Feeding my 27 kids.
5. Investing in a dream. We have found the work of our careers. Something so fun and rewarding we couldn’t have even drawn up. It was only after we stumbled into it that we started looking around thinking, “Wait, this is kinda the exact thing we want to do, isn’t it?”
[Pause]
We know this is a lot of info. We suggest taking a 2:29 break to enjoy a moment and character that fueled the start of Normal Sport in 2021.
[OK, we're back]
Let’s frame all of this a different way with a hypothetical question: How much money would you pay to eliminate 90 percent of the ads from the golf you watch on TV and ensure that you get a mostly ad-free product?
For many of you, the answer will be $0. For some of you, it will be much, much higher.
Not only would you enjoy a better golf watching experience for your money but you would be hailed as a conquering hero in strange and humorous corners of the internet by people who suddenly get to watch mostly commercial-free golf.
This is sort of the same idea we have for this newsletter. It’s nothing novel, but I have found that when I look at places I support from the angle of 1. I want this to exist and 2. I want to keep it clean and great (and even mostly free for my friends who don’t want to pay), I am more compelled to support them.
Here’s how Tim Carmichael put it in a recent essay that I loved.
The most economically powerful thing you can do is to buy something for your own enjoyment that also improves the world. This has always been the value proposition of journalism and art. It’s a nonexclusive good that’s best enjoyed non-exclusively.
Please note that this is not fuzzy-headed idealism or just sentiment: This is as concrete and comprehensive as it gets. It’s economic thinking that recognizes that goods don’t just exist to be used up, but are objects of labor produced by and for members of a commonwealth.
“I can think of few writers who make me stop everything to read their work. You’re one of them. Your work has been my favorite discovery of the past year. I used to be in publishing. I was burnt out on writers. You have renewed my faith in the art. Thanks for that. Thanks for your work. Thanks for putting something beautiful in the world.”
“It's the modern day, more serious Bill Simmons column that doesn't seem to exist anywhere else - more niche topic (instead of all sports, just one), tons of insider humor, but with an authentic passion/voice that is actually more about life/important topics.”
“Something about the way it is written jives with how I enjoy consuming sports in general. It is reasoned and rational, while still being opinionated. I also like how there is something for everyone; the occasional follower of golf will get as much out of the newsletter as the true sicko.”